It's probably a bad thing for my blood pressure, but I've been reading a lot of unexpurgated bilge bemoaning the lack of 'British reserve' and people 'wearing their hearts on their sleeves' over the last 24 hours. These people complained about an apparent trend for people to grieve for the loss of those who are completely unrelated to them. They complain about the 'Diana Effect' and go on to draw a conclusion that this is entirely unworthy of traditional 'British' sentiments.
Where did this all come from?
Well, I've been reading the public responses on the BBC website to the temporary 'suspension of politics' in the wake of the tragic death of David Cameron's oldest son. Some people seem to resent the fact that Parliament was suspended for a short time out of respect for the grief of the Leader of the Opposition. Some people seem to think that it's a bad thing for others to respect the grief of someone in the public eye and to be affected by it.
Well, I've got news for them. Here is a famous quote:
No man is an island, entire of itself; every man is a piece of the continent, a part of the main. If a clod be washed away by the sea, Europe is the less, as well as if a promontory were, as well as if a manor of thy friend's or of thine own were: any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind, and therefore never send to know for whom the bells tolls; it tolls for thee.
The key phrase is this: "Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind"
Isn't this what we are ALL called to be? To be 'involved in mankind'... to be in solidarity with those who suffer? To share their grief and to let them know that they do not suffer alone or in isolation.
I do not have the right to presume to know what Mr and Mrs Cameron are feeling right now. Their grief is unique and personal to them alone. But no matter whether someone is the Leader of an Opposition or whether they're the local refuse collector, if I come to hear about a tragedy or a loss they are suffering, it is heartless of me to refuse to feel sympathy out of some misguided loyalty to some concept of 'Britishness' best now left in the wastes of history.
Jesus commanded us to love one another as we would ourselves wish to be loved. It seems to me that the so-called 'stiff upper lip' is in direct opposition to this commandment. So what if we're now more inclined to show our sympathy and be more emotionally affected by the losses of those in the public eye? Those losses are no different to those that are in our own 'private' eyes: those of our own immediate circles... We wouldn't be expected to be unaffected there would we?
If being drawn to sympathy and caring by the plight of someone 'famous' is a bad thing, then I don't know what is good any more.
God asks that I wear my heart on my sleeve. And this I do openly in order to honour Him and those who suffer in my midst. And woe betide anyone who suggests otherwise in my presence.
2 comments:
-
Anonymous
on
26 February 2009 at 15:03
As Jesus says,we are all neighbours to each other. I was quite isolated with my own son's situation yesterday,and when I heard about little Ivan,I remembered that all people suffer.Rich or poor,famous or otherwise.Made me feel less alone. It's also pleasant to hear human vulnerability being expressed in solidarity with each other.I keep using the word solidarity,it's my word of the week,I'm afraid.
-
Anonymous
on
26 February 2009 at 15:17
Hi Tony,I think I posted my previous comment to the wrong post? I meant to address this one but hit the one below maybe,sorry for the confusion if I did.Technical I ain't!!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Post a Comment